Perfection
So I’ve been reading Republic by Plato for school. I’ve been specifically reading selections that have to do with his theory of forms (or theory of ideas). The very quick version of this theory pertains to is the perfect version of things and how attainable or unattainable it is. His thinking has spurred some musing of my own. I’ve been wondering what perfect would look like if it existed. And through thinking about it (so far), I’ve decided that perfect looks one of two ways. Either there are seemingly infinite perfects or there is only one Perfect. I explain:
Starting off with the idea of seemingly infinite perfects, I’m going to use the idea of the perfect chair. First though I’ll explain why I say ‘seemingly infinite.’ Through this idea of though, there are is a perfect solution of every desire, so the number of perfects is contingent on the number of desires possible. Now to the chair. The desire behind the chair is to rest one’s legs so they don’t have to stand. So the perfect chair is the ground. That desire is fulfilled. Now if you’d like to keep clean/dry or have your legs off the ground as well, the new perfect chair would be a pole that you can sit on top of. Adding comfort you require a wider base to sit on. Soon after you’ll want to rest your back, so then back support comes into play. At this point we have the regular idea of a chair which seems to work well for most needs, but that’s not where we stop. Another desire is the ability to look around, so we have pivoting chairs like bar stools, and then we want mobility as well so we get rolling office chairs. We want more comfort so we have backs that recline, arm rests, height adjustments. Now we run into a place were the idea of the perfect chair took two different routes trying to get there. Lazy Boys have leg rests that pop up and are greatly padded, but aren’t as mobile as an office chair. Added though are cup holders for convenience. Taking a step back and looking at the office chair, you’re looking at an invention that allows the user to fulfill the desires of staying of resting their legs, off of the dirty/wet ground, with a comfortable seat and back support, which allows not only pivoting but 360 degree mobility and adjustable comfort settings. All of this points towards the second theory of perfect. If the first were correct, the perfect chair is something that allows you to rest your legs, the ground, but if that is the fact then why are we still searching for the perfect chair? There are still more additions we could add to the chair like having no legs to get in the way of the users own leg movement, but at the same time a person might want legs to wrap a foot around. And what if we want our chair to transport us longer distances than across the room at high speeds (car/train/plane).
If we are still striving for that perfect chair, it makes me thinking that there is one solution to every desire. The ultimate multi-device that would put the Swiss Army Knife to shame. It is so hard to imagine a ‘thing’ that would fulfill every desire though, because (at the moment) it is utterly impossible to create. But it must exist. There is a theory that says that if we have a desire for something, a solution must exist. It works from the most basic desires. We have thirst, so water exists. We hunger; there is food. We tire; there is sleep. I’ve heard this argument used applied to God, but that’s a different blog topic. This theory equally supports both of my theories. Since we have desires, there maybe the ultimate desire fulfill-er out there, but for our minds, it better supports the infinite perfects theory.
If infinite perfects is true, then why are we still searching for that perfect chair? We found the perfect chair at the beginning of existence, the ground, but more desires got tagged on. Our thirst was fulfilled by water, but desires for flavor and nutrients were added. Our desires have become so complex, that we look past the perfect solution for simple desires.
Which theory is more convincing to you?
















